In 1970, Listerine’s marketing department was feeling the heat. P&G had launched a new mouthwash brand as a competitor a few years before. They called it Scope. And they attacked Listerine’s obvious weakness — taste. Listerine burned like medicine. Consumers knew it. So Scope entered the market using taste as its differentiator. They claimed a mouthwash didn’t have to taste bad. And they were quickly gaining market share with aggressive ad campaigns.
Listerine’s marketing team discussed how to respond to this threat. Should they make their formula taste milder? Or maybe they should release a new “light” version to compete with Scope? But while doing research, they realized something strange. Focus groups who tested a mild version of Listerine all said the taste was better. But they “couldn’t feel it working.” So the alternative formula scored higher in taste. But lower in effectiveness. This opened the eyes of the Listerine marketing team. Sure, their taste was a weakness. But that weakness increased the believability of their strength — killing bacteria that caused bad breath. So Listerine’s marketing team didn’t try to cover that weakness to respond to Scope. They decided to embrace it. They released a new campaign and said: “The taste people hate, twice a day.” People loved the honesty. And they kept Listerine as the serious germ-killer in their minds. Thanks to that campaign, Listerine stayed the market leader. Despite P&G’s deep advertising pockets behind Scope.
We’ve talked about value tradeoffs before. When you embrace your negative, your claim about the positive becomes more convincing. And here’s the thing. Good positioning always brings obvious weaknesses. Because positioning is not about being perfect. That’s impossible. Positioning is about building preference. Being the right option for a certain type of client, who’d like to solve a certain problem, in a certain way. That means choosing competitive factors where you’ll be strong and different. And leaving others where you’ll be intentionally weak. Just like Listerine. But most B2B brands do the opposite. They pretend they don’t have any weaknesses. They claim to be the best at everything with all-in-one and end-to-end solutions. Even though they don’t have the same quality at every service. They claim to serve a wide range of client types equally well. Even when their value fits specific businesses. Guess what happens when they message being the best at everything, for everyone? They lose their believability. Because when everything seems too perfect, buyers get suspicious. Nobody believes a lawyer who says he can handle property, tax, and trademark cases for both individuals and multinational companies. But you’d believe the one who says he only handles trademark disputes for multinational companies and nothing else. Because faking perfection creates suspicion. Buyers would like to know the downsides of a purchase, together with the benefits. Listerine kills bacteria. Downside? It tastes like medicine. Fair enough. It’s not perfect, but it’s the right one for the job. It’s a different option with clear tradeoffs. So use these questions to test your positioning and find opportunities to strengthen your differentiation:
Don’t try to make your brand perfect at everything. Choose what makes you different. And own the weaknesses that prove it. Build preference, not perfection.
|
Join 10,000+ B2B founders getting the strategies of iconic brands.
Every business has dozens of problems at any given time. Even thriving ones. A new regulation comes up and you have to comply. You have to hire but can’t find the right candidate. Or your clients churn and you have to find out why. Being in business means dealing with problems. It’s the same for your potential clients. The problem your firm claims to solve is among a huge list of problems your buyers have. They have limited time and resources. But many problems to solve. So how do they decide...
The biggest mistake in B2B messaging is copying consumer brands. I know. Who doesn’t want to be inspirational like Nike? Who doesn’t want to influence buyers with a strong mission like Patagonia’s? But think about it. These are consumer brands. They sell commoditized products. A jacket is a jacket. No matter what brand you buy from, the product functionally does the same thing. So to differentiate themselves, consumer brands have to give intangible meaning to their tangible products. They...
Most marketers think social proof sells. But it doesn’t. It reassures. And this difference changes how to do messaging right. Imagine going to a B2B brand’s website. You’d like to figure out what they do. But you struggle. Because first, you read an aspirational mission statement that means nothing. Then they bombard you with social proof: “We helped this many clients.” “We generated this much revenue.” You keep scrolling to find an explanation of what the hell this brand does. But no chance....